Marie Yovanovitch gets standing ovation from the audience as she departs

[Capricorn]

As Marie Yovanovitch departs the audience in the gallery breaks into applause and some give her a standing ovation because she has more than earned it. pic.twitter.com/ks0elkcFDA

— Amee Vanderpool (@girlsreallyrule) November 15, 2019

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

Topic

[Gur]

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes.

Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

Capricorn posted on November 15, 2019 at 09:15

Adult language is permitted if it is contextual and not aimed personally at a poster.

[Capricorn]

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes. Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

All she said was that Trump did not commit his high crimes in her presence.

This is for the Congress to decide based on all the testimonies given by witnesses so far, and many witnesses who will come forth in the coming weeks.

 

Her testimony basically proved that Trump wanted her out of the way so he could bribe and extort the Ukranian government for his personal gain.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Desert_Fox]

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes.

Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

Immaterial, except in your tiny trumpturd brain.

". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast

[Johnny Yuma]

Capricorn wrote:

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes. Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

All she said was that Trump did not commit his high crimes in her presence. This is for the Congress to decide based on all the testimonies given by witnesses so far, and many witnesses who will come forth in the coming weeks. Her testimony basically proved that Trump wanted her out of the way so he could bribe and extort the Ukranian government for his personal gain.

“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?” asked Rep. Stewart.

“No,” answered Yovanovitch.

You are wrong, she didn’t know why she was recalled…Her testimony didn’t prove anything..I am wondering why she was there at all…In the end, this was a big dud for the Democrats…I watched the full hearing…Did you?

[Johnny Yuma]

FLASHBACK: President Barack Obama Fired All George W. Bush-Appointed Ambassadors in 2008

Former United States ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified Friday about her dismay upon being fired by President Donald Trump, but it’s actually quite common for presidents to do so after taking office.
The State Department issued a December 2008 notice to Bush-appointed ambassadors to submit their resignations, effective when President Barack Obama took office in 2009, according to the Washington Post.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/15/flashback-president-barack-obama-fired-all-george-w-bush-appointed-ambassadors-in-2008/

[Capricorn]

Johnny Yuma wrote:

FLASHBACK: President Barack Obama Fired All George W. Bush-Appointed Ambassadors in 2008 Former United States ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified Friday about her dismay upon being fired by President Donald Trump, but it’s actually quite common for presidents to do so after taking office. The State Department issued a December 2008 notice to Bush-appointed ambassadors to submit their resignations, effective when President Barack Obama took office in 2009, according to the Washington Post. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/15/flashback-president-barack-obama-fired-all-george-w-bush-appointed-ambassadors-in-2008/

 

It is the firing of Ambassador because she was in the way for Trump to commit bribery and extortion that is an impeachable offense.

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Capricorn]

Johnny Yuma wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes. Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

All she said was that Trump did not commit his high crimes in her presence. This is for the Congress to decide based on all the testimonies given by witnesses so far, and many witnesses who will come forth in the coming weeks. Her testimony basically proved that Trump wanted her out of the way so he could bribe and extort the Ukranian government for his personal gain.

“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?” asked Rep. Stewart. “No,” answered Yovanovitch. You are wrong, she didn’t know why she was recalled…Her testimony didn’t prove anything..I am wondering why she was there at all…In the end, this was a big dud for the Democrats…I watched the full hearing…Did you?

I watched the hearings – Friday was the considered the worst possible day for the orange piece of shit. And I also read the Mueller report BTW.  Did you?

" All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force. " — George Orwell.

[Johnny Yuma]

Capricorn wrote:

Johnny Yuma wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes. Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

All she said was that Trump did not commit his high crimes in her presence. This is for the Congress to decide based on all the testimonies given by witnesses so far, and many witnesses who will come forth in the coming weeks. Her testimony basically proved that Trump wanted her out of the way so he could bribe and extort the Ukranian government for his personal gain.

“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?” asked Rep. Stewart. “No,” answered Yovanovitch. You are wrong, she didn’t know why she was recalled…Her testimony didn’t prove anything..I am wondering why she was there at all…In the end, this was a big dud for the Democrats…I watched the full hearing…Did you?

I watched the hearings – Friday was the considered the worst possible day for the orange piece of shit. And I also read the Mueller report BTW. Did you?

Reading your posts about the hearings you wasn’t watching the same hearing I was…

[Desert_Fox]

Johnny Yuma wrote:

FLASHBACK: President Barack Obama Fired All George W. Bush-Appointed Ambassadors in 2008

Former United States ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified Friday about her dismay upon being fired by President Donald Trump, but it’s actually quite common for presidents to do so after taking office.
The State Department issued a December 2008 notice to Bush-appointed ambassadors to submit their resignations, effective when President Barack Obama took office in 2009, according to the Washington Post.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/15/flashback-president-barack-obama-fired-all-george-w-bush-appointed-ambassadors-in-2008/

Replacing ambassadors as a matter of protocol and replacing them as a matter of political motivation under circumstances of illegal actions by the president who’s firing her are more than a little different. Not something you would understand I’m sure.

". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast

[Desert_Fox]

Johnny Yuma wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Johnny Yuma wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Gur wrote:

Capricorn wrote:

Because Trump committed crimes behind her back for which he confessed in public already, and Mulvaney later confirmed that such crimes are commited regularly by Trump, and for American people to “get over it”.

Yovanovitch stated she had no knowledge of any crimes committed by President Trump. And had no information about POTUS accepting bribes. Is Yovanovitch lying about this too?

All she said was that Trump did not commit his high crimes in her presence. This is for the Congress to decide based on all the testimonies given by witnesses so far, and many witnesses who will come forth in the coming weeks. Her testimony basically proved that Trump wanted her out of the way so he could bribe and extort the Ukranian government for his personal gain.

“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?” asked Rep. Stewart. “No,” answered Yovanovitch. You are wrong, she didn’t know why she was recalled…Her testimony didn’t prove anything..I am wondering why she was there at all…In the end, this was a big dud for the Democrats…I watched the full hearing…Did you?

I watched the hearings – Friday was the considered the worst possible day for the orange piece of shit. And I also read the Mueller report BTW. Did you?

Reading your posts about the hearings you wasn’t watching the same hearing I was…

You watch through trumpturd glasses. 😋

". . . those who claim to know the Mind of God, who will tell you what God thinks and how He will judge and condemn others—those people are the greatest of all blasphemers." Aloysius Xingu Leng Pendergast

[Author]

Replies