- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by .
Special counsel Robert Mueller has definitively put to rest the collusion theory of President Trump’s election. That’s not a little embarrassing for the many journalists, talking heads, celebrities and instant experts who spent more than two years furiously speculating about Moscow “pee-pee” tapes, treasonous rendezvous and the president’s imminent arrest.
The president’s haters no doubt wish to memory-hole collusion and move on to the next anti-Trump theory. But not so fast: We want to laurel the punditry “champion” — the one who peddled the most nonsensical nonsense, the wildest inanities, the weirdest theories and unsubstantiated stories.
That’s where your brackets come in.
Our contenders are divided into four groups (not unlike NCAA conferences): the print journalists, the cable TV talkers, the Twitterati and the network news reporters and “analysts.” And the brackets are seeded, with the most visible and influential figures contending against the lesser-known….
In the Cable category, our top seed is MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow ( that nice young man seems to have been the favorite by the debatez krew ), in recognition of her seemingly interminable rants about the Kremlin not only electing Trump — with Trumpian “collusion,” of course — but practically running the US government. The second spot goes to her colleague Joe Scarborough, who likewise predicted Trump’s downfall at Mueller’s hands — right until the moment the special counsel shattered the fantasy.
Top among the Twitterati is Benjamin Wittes. The Brookings Institution fellow basked in the media glow that attended his Twitter predictions of Trump’s toppling. “Boom!” he would often tweet after news broke, with accompanying videos of cannons going off. A “Boom!” for BuzzFeed’s discredited story about Trump directing his ex-lawyer Michael Cohen to lie to Congress. And another “Boom!” for Cohen’s own instantly discredited testimony before Congress. And many others of the kind. The cannonballs all landed with a thud.
Wittes is followed, in the second spot, by Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe, who traded his stellar academic reputation for anti-Trump crankery. In July 2017, he tweeted that when senior Democrats say, “There is evidence of both collusion and obstruction, you can take that to the bank. Trump beware!” But Tribes’ collusion checks bounced.
In the ‘Cable’ bracket i think #6 John Brennan should have been rated higher – yeah, he only came on the scene after CNN or MSNBC hired him, but the dud was the guy that helped launch the fake dossier/collusion meme.
Paul Krugman, #3 in the Print bracket, echoed the NY Slimes hatred of Trump with his “There’s really no question about Trump/Putin collusion”. That was, is, and probably will still be one of the main lies that fiercely believed by the leader of the delusional hyenas that roam about the debatez forum.
OK, zomboids – line it up, and MARCH: hup, two, three, four….column LEFT, MARCH!…..
Capricorn posted on November 15, 2019 at 09:15
Adult language is permitted if it is contextual and not aimed personally at a poster.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.